<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Topics tagged with lengths]]></title><description><![CDATA[A list of topics that have been tagged with lengths]]></description><link>https://www.tokeet.com/community/tags/lengths</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2026 23:29:14 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://www.tokeet.com/community/tags/lengths.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Invalid Date</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Rategenie - Different prices for different lengths of stay]]></title><description><![CDATA[Hi Adam,
Thanks for the feature recommendation. We did not implement Length Of Stay (LOS) pricing in Rategenie because we didn’t believe the feature was consistent enough across the various channels. As a result the Rategnie feature may have been a bit cumbersome. This is something we will revisit in the future as LOS pricing gains a more uniformed pattern in the major channel APIs.
Thanks again.
]]></description><link>https://www.tokeet.com/community/topic/22/rategenie-different-prices-for-different-lengths-of-stay</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.tokeet.com/community/topic/22/rategenie-different-prices-for-different-lengths-of-stay</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Kwesi Steele]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Invalid Date</pubDate></item></channel></rss>