@Ryland-Nelson Great suggestion Ryland. I’ll go ahead and submit the ticket for this improvement request. In the meantime, please see the below possible workflow for this. Create booking from Dashboard. Refresh the dashboard screen and open the booking from the activity feed. [image: 1571073485323-f7edfb4b-7922-4aec-a388-43739517a55c-image.png]

Hi Blake. Thank you very much for your feedback. Photo ID request was made the first step in contract submission due to previous issues with guests signing the contract, and then exiting the page before submitting their photo ID. While we will discuss this matter again in the future, this behavior is unlikely to change in the near term, as we have seen a significant increase in photo ID submission as a result of moving the request from the end of the contract submission process to the beginning. If we can agree on a better solution for placement of the photo ID request, we will note the change publicly so that users are not caught off guard.

We add expenses in tokeet, and we manually re-add these to owner invoices. It would be AMAZING if there was an option to include expenses from tokeet on owner invoices.

Hi Blake. The Ignore for Booking.com feature does work with the Default rate. It applies to base, standard, promo, and group rates. Are you seeing different behavior in your use of the app? Also, are you referring to Rategenie or TV3?

Hi Blake. Yes, we updated the behavior of the app to allow template recipients to open the template on multiple devices and browsers. This is the new behavior you have experienced. Please let us know if you encounter any other issues with the app. Thank you for your feedback.

Hi Ryland. Thanks for your feedback. The notifications were removed previously due to user feedback. The team will investigate possibly bringing them back in the future, if there is enough user demand for the feature. It’s nice to know that some users found them useful.

@Ryland-Nelson Nice recommendations. We’ll definitely keep these and see what we can come up with. Please keep the suggestions coming.

@Ryland-Nelson we can add these for sure. I’ll have the team save them as feature requests. Thanks.

Hi Ryland, I’ve looked into this further and see that the issue is still as I stated it. Linked rooms create hold events with status “Confirmed” and are properly showing availability as blocked on the inventory search. I understand that there are still scenarios that will be problematic though…such as owners creating hold events with statuses meant to convey the meaning of the block, or you needing to set it to Pending so that you are aware that the reservation is not yet confirmed. In the meantime, any hold event that is not marked as confirmed will not properly block availability, but using Confirmed hold events will result in it working properly. Please let me know if you find a specific example where this is not the case. Thanks, Christian

Hey guys, I’ll have the design team review this and make updates as needed. Thanks for the feedback!

Hi Adam, I believe we already have this feature. The gap night rule allows you to set a variable min stay based on the length of the gap. Am I missing something here? [image: 1568327202891-screen-shot-2019-09-12-at-6.26.05-pm.png]

Hi Adam, Thanks for the feature recommendation. We did not implement Length Of Stay (LOS) pricing in Rategenie because we didn’t believe the feature was consistent enough across the various channels. As a result the Rategnie feature may have been a bit cumbersome. This is something we will revisit in the future as LOS pricing gains a more uniformed pattern in the major channel APIs. Thanks again.